The supreme court case of new jersey vs tlo is a celebrated case from the mid-1980s a high school student claimed that a search conducted by the school s vice principal, mr choplick, was a violation of her fourth amendment right because he had no warrant or probable cause. The majority of courts that have addressed the issue of the fourth amendment in the schools have, like the supreme court of new jersey in this case, reached a middle position: the fourth amendment applies to searches conducted by school authorities, but the special needs of the school environment require assessment of the legality of such searches against a standard less exacting than that of probable cause. United states court of appeals,district of columbia circuit state of new jersey, et al, petitioners v environmental protection agency, respondent utility air regulatory group, et al, intervenors. Facts of the case tlo was a fourteen-year-old she was accused of smoking in the girls' bathroom of her high school a principal at the school questioned her and searched her purse, yielding a bag of marijuana and other drug paraphernalia. The juvenile court denied the motion to suppress and the student was found to be delinquent the appellant division affirmed the trial court's finding there was no fourth amendment violation the supreme court of new jersey overruled the appellate division issue.
In argument wars, you will try out your persuasive abilities by arguing a real supreme court case skip to main content toggle navigation play new jersey v tlo. The juvenile and domestic relations court ruled in favor of new jersey that school officials have the right to search students with reasonable suspicion that a crime has been or is being committed or in order to enforce school rules. Best answer: new jersey v tlo facts of the case tlo was a fourteen-year-old she was accused of smoking in the girls' bathroom of her high school.
Street law, inc and the supreme court historical society present landmark cases of the us supreme court street law / landmark cases / cases / new jersey v tlo. The background of new jersey v tlo (1985) in 1984, in the piscataway township high school in new jersey, a female student who was classified as a minor at the time of her arrest was convicted of possessing illegal paraphernalia utilized for the consumption of marijuana the acronym 'tlo' was given to her as a result of her status as a minor. New jersey v t l o , (1985) is the case that impacted me the most it is a decision by the us supreme court regarding the constitutionality of a search of a public high school student after she was caught smoking. The supreme court database is the definitive source for researchers, students, journalists, and citizens interested in the us supreme court the database contains over two hundred pieces of information about each case decided by the court between the 1946 and 2012 terms.
New jersey, petitioner v t l 0 on writ of certiorari to the supreme court of new jersey [june-, 1984] justice stevens, dissenting this case, however, does. New jersey won but later on tlo went back to court and charged as ajuvenile. The juvenile and domestic relations court of new jersey, middlesex county found her guilty and sentenced her to probation for one year on appeal, the superior court of new jersey, appellate division affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress evidence.
In its decision in this case, the new jersey supreme court addressed three distinct questions: (1) what is the proper standard for judging the reasonableness of a school official's search of a student's purse (2) on the facts of this case, did the school official violate that standard and ( 3) whether the exclusionary rule bars the use in a. New jersey v tlo (1985) tlo was a 14-year-old student at a new jersey public high school the school had specific rules against smoking in school buildings or on school property. Supreme court cases chandler v miller, 520 us 305 (1997): the supreme court found unconstitutional a georgia statute requiring candidates for state offices to certify that they had tested negative in a drug urinalysis. The court sided with the school, and tlo took her case to the new jersey supreme court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used the state of new jersey appealed the decision to the united states supreme court.